Background: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) shows promise in detecting and monitoring breast cancer, but standard spin-echo (SE) echo-planar DWI methods often have poor image quality and low spatial resolution. Proposed alternatives include readoutsegmented (RS) echo-planar imaging and axially reformatted (AR)-simultaneous multislice (SMS) imaging. Purpose: To compare the resolution and image quality of standard SE echo-planar imaging DWI with two high-spatial-resolution alternatives, RS echo-planar and AR-SMS imaging, for breast imaging. Materials and Methods: In a prospective study (2016-2018), three 5-minute DWI protocols were acquired at 3.0 T, including standard SE echo-planar imaging, RS echo-planar imaging with five segments, and AR-SMS imaging with four times slice acceleration. Participants were women undergoing breast MRI either as part of a treatment response clinical trial or undergoing breast MRI for screening or suspected cancer. A commercial breast phantom was imaged for resolution comparison. Three breast radiologists reviewed images in random order, including clinical images indicating the lesion, images with b value of 800 sec/mm2, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps from the three randomly labeled DWI methods. Readers measured the longest dimension and lesion-average ADC on three DWI methods, reported measurement confidence, and rated or ranked the quality of each image. The scores were fit to a linear mixed-effects model with intercepts for reader and subject. Results: The smallest feature (1 mm) was only detectible in a phantom on images from AR-SMS DWI. Thirty lesions from 28 women (mean age, 50 years ± 13 [standard deviation]) were evaluated. On the five-point Likert scale for image quality, AR-SMS imaging scored 1.31 points higher than SE echo-planar imaging and 0.74 points higher than RS echo-planar imaging, whereas RS echo-planar imaging scored 0.57 points higher than SE echo-planar imaging (all P < .001). Conclusion: The axially reformatted simultaneous multislice protocol was rated highest for image quality, followed by the readoutsegmented echo-planar imaging protocol. Both were rated higher than the standard spin-echo echo-planar imaging.
Bibliographical noteFunding Information:
Study supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (UL1-TR002494) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH P41 EB027061, NIH S10OD017974-01, and NIH R21CA201834). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
© RSNA, 2020.
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural