A model research curriculum for emergency medicine

David Cline, Philip Henneman, Peter Van Ligten, William Spivey, James Olson, Andrew Levitt, Daniel Dire, Brian Zink, Robert Lowe, David Seaberg, James Manning, Gerard Martin, Hubert Mickel, Michelle Biros, Donald Yealy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)184-192
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1992

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Attend a seminar(s) on existing funding sources (National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation, Department of Defense, private foundations, etc) identifying most appropriate funding programs and successful techniques of grant writing. Prepare or assist with the preparation of a grant proposal, including preparation of a budget for a research project outlining direct and indirect costs.

Funding Information:
196. PocockJ P, Hughes MD, Lee RJ : Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. N Engl J Mad 1987;317:426-432. 197. SheehanT J : The medical literature: Let the reader beware. Arch Intern Mad1980;140:472- 474. 198. McCaffery M: Writing that's worth reading: II. Style. Can FaroP hys1 980;26:585-587. 199. AMA Manual of Style. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1988. 200. Burney RE, Tintinalli JE: How to write a collective review. Ann Emerg Mad 1987;16:1402. 201. Koran 6: A simple way to improve the chances for acceptance of your scientific paper. N Engl J Mad 1988;315:1298. 202. Fulginite VF: On the editorial process in the medical literature. Am JDis Child1984;138:337- 339. 203. Callaham M: Everything you wanted to know about peer-reviewj ournals, but were afraid to ask. Acad Emerg Med 1989;1:7-12. 204. McCaffery M: Writing that's worth reading: IV. The review process or, what do they know anyhow? Can Fam Phys 1980;26:872-876. 205. Bennie D, Kronick DA, Burnham JC, et ah Editorial peer review in biomedical publication. JAMA 1990;2 63:1317-1404. 206. McCaffery M: Writing that's worth reading: III. Submission, or, don't give up on what you give in. Can Fam Phys 1980;26:749-751. 207. McCaffery M: Writing that's worth reading: V. Reading proofs or, did I really write that? Can Fam Phys 1980;26:969-972. 208. Lea JW: Techniques of oral presentation, in McGaghie WC, Frey JJ (eds): Handbookf or the Academic Physician. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1986, p 305-31 I. 209. Audy JR: How to deliver papers at scientific meetings. AnesthA nalg 1961;40:113-118. 210. Evans M, Pollock AV: The ten minute presentation, in Troidl H, Spitzer WO, McPeek B (ads): Principles and Practice of Research. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1986, p 236-239. 211. Reid Y, Ves~eber KH: The poster session: Audio visual aids, in Troidl H, Spitzer WO, McPeek B (eds): Principles and Practice of Research, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1986, p 254-267. 212. Reif-LehrerL : Writing a SuccessfulG rantA pplication. Boston, Jones and Bartlett, 1989. 213. Eaves GN: Preparation of the research grant application: Opportunities and pitfalls. Grants Mug t984;7:151-157. 214. KrathwoN DR: Haw to Prepare a ResearchP ratocakS uggestions for ThoseS eeking Funds for Behavioral Science Research. Syracuse, New York, Syracuse University, 1977. 215. Cummings SR, Washington AE, Ireland C, et ah Writing and funding a research proposal, in Hulley SB, Cummings SR (eds): Designing Clinical Research. Battimore,W illiams & Wilkins, 1988, p 184-196. 216. Mattox KL: Funding research in emergency medicine (editorial). Ann EmergM ad 1984;13:976. 217. White BC: Annals and academic respectability (editorial). Ann EmergM eal 1990;19: 1338-1339. 218. Kelley MP, West P, AndersonJ : On collaboration: Reflections on the preparation of an intradisciplinary research proposal. Health Bull 1990;48:36-40.

Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.


  • emergency medicine
  • research

Cite this