A network analysis of developing brain cultures

V. N. Christopoulos, D. V. Boeff, C. D. Evans, D. A. Crowe, B. Amirikian, Angeliki Georgopoulos, Apostolos P Georgopoulos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

We recorded electrical activity from four developing embryonic brain cultures (4-40 days in vitro) using multielectrode arrays (MEAs) with 60 embedded electrodes. Data were filtered for local field potentials (LFPs) and downsampled to 1 ms to yield a matrix of time series consisting of 60 electrode x 60 000 time samples per electrode per day per MEA. Each electrode time series was rendered stationary and nonautocorrelated by applying an ARIMA (25, 1, 1) model and taking the residuals (i.e. innovations). Two kinds of analyses were then performed. First, a pairwise crosscorrelation (CC) analysis (±25 1 ms lags) revealed systematic changes in CC with lag, day in vitro (DIV), and inter-electrode distance. Specifically, (i) positive CCs were 1.76x more prevalent and 1.44x stronger (absolute value) than negative ones, and (ii) the strength of CC increased with DIV and decreased with lag and inter-electrode distance. Second, a network equilibrium analysis was based on the instantaneous (1 ms resolution) logratio of the number of electrodes that were above or below their mean, called simultaneous departure from equilibrium, SDE. This measure possesses a major computational advantage over the pairwise crosscorrelation approach because it is very simple and fast to calculate, an important factor for the analysis of large networks. The results obtained with SDE covaried highly with CC over DIV, which further validates the usefulness of this measure as a computationally effective tool for large scale network analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number046008
JournalJournal of Neural Engineering
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2012

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A network analysis of developing brain cultures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this