TY - JOUR
T1 - A process for identifying marginal performers among students in a clerkship
AU - Parenti, Connie M.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1993/7
Y1 - 1993/7
N2 - Purpose. To evaluate a review process for identifying marginal performers among students in a clerkship. Method. To better identify the marginal performers among the students participating in the medicine clerkship at the University of Minnesota Medical School-Minneapolis, the Medicine Clerkship Committee reviewed in 1990-91 and 1991-92 all students rated by faculty or housestaff as below expectations for any of nine areas of clinical performance (27 students of 890, 3%). (In the past, a student was considered to be a marginal performer only if he or she was assigned an unsatisfactory numerical grade, calculated from the nine ratings, or if written comments by housestaff and faculty and the opinions of the attending faculty and clerkship site coordinator indicated that the student should fail.) Chi-square analysis was used to compare the number of students judged to be marginal performers under the review process with the number of marginal performers in 1988-89 and 1989-90. The two groups were also compared based on their preclerkship performances on standardized examinations. Results. Ten of those reviewed (37%) were judged to have performed marginally. Although the study group’s performance on standardized examinations was not different from that of students during the previous two years, significantly fewer students were identified as marginal performers before the review process began than afterwards (2 of 867, 0.2%, versus 10 of 890,1.1%, p < .05). Conclusion. Without changing the way in which faculty and housestaff evaluated students, the review process improved the medicine clerkship evaluation system by identifying significantly more students who were marginal performers.
AB - Purpose. To evaluate a review process for identifying marginal performers among students in a clerkship. Method. To better identify the marginal performers among the students participating in the medicine clerkship at the University of Minnesota Medical School-Minneapolis, the Medicine Clerkship Committee reviewed in 1990-91 and 1991-92 all students rated by faculty or housestaff as below expectations for any of nine areas of clinical performance (27 students of 890, 3%). (In the past, a student was considered to be a marginal performer only if he or she was assigned an unsatisfactory numerical grade, calculated from the nine ratings, or if written comments by housestaff and faculty and the opinions of the attending faculty and clerkship site coordinator indicated that the student should fail.) Chi-square analysis was used to compare the number of students judged to be marginal performers under the review process with the number of marginal performers in 1988-89 and 1989-90. The two groups were also compared based on their preclerkship performances on standardized examinations. Results. Ten of those reviewed (37%) were judged to have performed marginally. Although the study group’s performance on standardized examinations was not different from that of students during the previous two years, significantly fewer students were identified as marginal performers before the review process began than afterwards (2 of 867, 0.2%, versus 10 of 890,1.1%, p < .05). Conclusion. Without changing the way in which faculty and housestaff evaluated students, the review process improved the medicine clerkship evaluation system by identifying significantly more students who were marginal performers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027296418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027296418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00001888-199307000-00019
DO - 10.1097/00001888-199307000-00019
M3 - Article
C2 - 8323653
AN - SCOPUS:0027296418
SN - 1040-2446
VL - 68
SP - 575
EP - 577
JO - Academic Medicine
JF - Academic Medicine
IS - 7
ER -