A theoretically grounded systematic review of material incentives for weight loss: Implications for interventions

Rachel J. Burns, Angela S. Donovan, Ronald T. Ackermann, Emily A. Finch, Alexander J. Rothman, Robert W. Jeffery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Providing material incentives for weight loss is a class of intervention strategies that has received considerable attention; however, the effectiveness of this class of strategies is uncertain. Attending to distinctions among incentive strategies may clarify our understanding of prior work and inform the design of future interventions. Purpose: A theoretical framework is proposed that distinguishes between four classes of incentive strategies and is used to organize randomized controlled trials of material incentives for weight loss. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted. Results: Findings were mixed with regards to the overall efficacy of material incentives for weight loss. Three of the four proposed incentive categories are represented in the literature. Heterogeneous methods were used across studies rendering comparisons between studies difficult. Conclusions: Definitive conclusions about the usefulness of material incentives for weight loss could not be drawn. A theoretically grounded approach to designing and testing incentive strategies is encouraged.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)375-388
Number of pages14
JournalAnnals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012

Keywords

  • Exercise
  • Incentives
  • Weight loss

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A theoretically grounded systematic review of material incentives for weight loss: Implications for interventions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this