Ability of the caltrac accelerometer to assess daily physical activity levels

M. T. Richardson, A. S. Leon, D. R. Jacobs, B. E. Ainsworth, R. Serfass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

68 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of the Caltrac accelerometer to assess habitual daily physical activity levels. Methods. The ability of the Caltrac accelerometer to assess 24-hour physical activity (PA) levels was studied in 28 men and 50 women, age 20 to 59 years, with varying levels of self-reported PA. Twelve days of Caltrac readings obtained over 1 year's duration were compared to simultaneously recorded 48- hour PA records. Additionally, 28 days of Caltrac readings obtained over 1 year's duration were compared to mean values of the following validation measures assessed repeatedly over a 1-year period: a 4-week version of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire (FWH); VO2 peak; and percent body fat. Results. The Caltrac measurements of movement (in MET minutes per day-1) were significantly associated with the following: PA record indices of total (r = .51) and heavy (r = .34) and PA; FWH indices of total (r = .30), heavy R = .36) and moderate (r = .23) PA; , and VO2 peak (r = .24). However, the Caltrac measurements of caloric PA record and FWH indices of PA, although there were directly associated with percent body fat (r = .50) and inversely associated with VO2 peak (r = -.26). Conclusions. Caltrac measurements of movement exhibited a moderate associated with several criterion measures related to habitual PA, whereas Caltrac measurements of total energy expenditure, were not reflective of varying levels of PA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-113
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

Keywords

  • Caltrac accelerometer
  • exercise
  • physical activity
  • validity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ability of the caltrac accelerometer to assess daily physical activity levels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this