Academic Performance, Career Potential, Creativity, and Job Performance: Can One Construct Predict Them All?

Nathan R. Kuncel, Sarah A. Hezlett, Deniz S. Ones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

481 Scopus citations

Abstract

This meta-analysis addresses the question of whether 1 general cognitive ability measure developed for predicting academic performance is valid for predicting performance in both educational and work domains. The validity of the Miller Analogies Test (MAT; W. S. Miller, 1960) for predicting 18 academic and work-related criteria was examined. MAT correlations with other cognitive tests (e.g., Raven's Matrices [J. C. Raven, 1965]; Graduate Record Examinations) also were meta-analyzed. The results indicate that the abilities measured by the MAT are shared with other cognitive ability instruments and that these abilities are generalizably valid predictors of academic and vocational criteria, as well as evaluations of career potential and creativity. These findings contradict the notion that intelligence at work is wholly different from intelligence at school, extending the voluminous literature that supports the broad importance of general cognitive ability (g).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)148-161
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of personality and social psychology
Volume86
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2004

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Academic Performance, Career Potential, Creativity, and Job Performance: Can One Construct Predict Them All?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this