Agenda control, majority party power, and the house committee on rules, 1937-52

Eric Schickler, Kathryn L Pearson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations


The role of the U.S. House Rules Committee is consequential for theories of congressional parties, yet its role during the "conservative coalition" era is not well understood. We systematically analyzed the politics surrounding all special rules considered in Democratic Congresses from 1937 to 1952. We found that Rules repeatedly used its agenda power to push to the floor conservative initiatives that were opposed by the Democratic administration, the Rules Committee chair, and most northern Democrats, especially in Congresses that followed Republican election gains. The 44 conservative initiatives we identified include many of the most important policy issues considered during the period. Our findings challenge the idea that the majority party has consistently enjoyed a veto over which initiatives reach the floor, and they underscore the limits of roll-call-vote analysis in assessments of agenda control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)455-491
Number of pages37
JournalLegislative Studies Quarterly
Issue number4
StatePublished - Nov 1 2009

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Agenda control, majority party power, and the house committee on rules, 1937-52'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this