Approximate confidence intervals for one proportion and difference of two proportions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Constructing a confidence interval for a binomial proportion or the difference of two proportions is a routine exercise in daily data analysis. The best-known method is the Wald interval based on the asymptotic normal approximation to the distribution of the observed sample proportion, though it is known to have a bad performance for small to medium sample sizes. Recently, Agresti and his co-workers proposed an Adding-4 method: 4 pseudo-observations are added with 2 successes and 2 failures and then the resulting (pseudo-)sample proportion is used. The method is simple and performs extremely well. Here we propose an approximate method based on a t-approximation that takes account of the uncertainty in estimating the variance of the observed (pseudo-)sample proportion. It follows the same line of using a t-test, rather than z-test, in testing the mean of a normal distribution with an unknown variance. For some circumstances our proposed method has a higher coverage probability than the Adding-4 method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)143-157
Number of pages15
JournalComputational Statistics and Data Analysis
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 28 2002

Keywords

  • Binomial
  • Satterthwaite's method
  • Wald
  • t-distribution

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Approximate confidence intervals for one proportion and difference of two proportions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this