Automated analysis of fundamental features of brain structures

Jack L. Lancaster, D. Reese McKay, Matthew D. Cykowski, Michael J. Martinez, Xi Tan, Sunil Valaparla, Yi Zhang, Peter T. Fox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Automated image analysis of the brain should include measures of fundamental structural features such as size and shape. We used principal axes (P-A) measurements to measure overall size and shape of brain structures segmented from MR brain images. The rationale was that quantitative volumetric studies of brain structures would benefit from shape standardization as had been shown for whole brain studies. P-A analysis software was extended to include controls for variability in position and orientation to support individual structure spatial normalization (ISSN). The rationale was that ISSN would provide a bias-free means to remove elementary sources of a structure's spatial variability in preparation for more detailed analyses. We studied nine brain structures (whole brain, cerebral hemispheres, cerebellum, brainstem, caudate, putamen, hippocampus, inferior frontal gyrus, and precuneus) from the 40-brain LPBA40 atlas. This paper provides the first report of anatomical positions and principal axes orientations within a standard reference frame, in addition to "shape/size related" principal axes measures, for the nine brain structures from the LPBA40 atlas. Analysis showed that overall size (mean volume) for internal brain structures was preserved using shape standardization while variance was reduced by more than 50%. Shape standardization provides increased statistical power for between-group volumetric studies of brain structures compared to volumetric studies that control only for whole brain size. To test ISSN's ability to control for spatial variability of brain structures we evaluated the overlap of 40 regions of interest (ROIs) in a standard reference frame for the nine different brain structures before and after processing. Standardizations of orientation or shape were ineffective when not combined with position standardization. The greatest reduction in spatial variability was seen for combined standardizations of position, orientation and shape. These results show that ISSNs automated processing can be a valuable asset for measuring and controlling variability of fundamental features of brain structures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)371-380
Number of pages10
JournalNeuroinformatics
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgements Research supported by grants from the Human Brain Mapping Project jointly funded by NIMH and NIDA (P20 MH/ DA52176), the General Clinical Research Core (HSC19940074H), and NIBIB (K01 EB006395). Additional support was provided through the NIH/National Center for Research Resources through grants P41 RR013642 and U54 RR021813 (Center for Computational Biology (CCB)). Also, support for Cykowski was from F32-DC009116 to MDC (NIH/NIDCD).

Keywords

  • ISSN
  • LPBA40
  • Mango
  • Principal axis analysis
  • Shape standardization
  • Spatial incidence map
  • Volumetric variance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Automated analysis of fundamental features of brain structures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this