Abstract
Professor Michaels makes many claims in his paper and in the published articles that it incorporates; four of these claims are crucial. Although all four will offend some readers, two persuade me, and indeed I have argued for them in print. © 1989 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 109-121 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Law and Literature |
Volume | 1 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1989 |