Black Gold, Green Earth: An Analysis of the Petroleum Industry's CSR Environmental Sustainability Discourse

Amy O'Connor, Katherine L. Gronewold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study examines 21 environmental sustainability reports from Fortune Global 500 petroleum companies to determine how competitive advantage and institutional language is used by corporations to explain their corporate social responsibility (CSR). Results suggest the environmental sustainability discourse of the world's largest petroleum companies contains both institutional and competitive advantage language. Also, results indicate that corporations blend the two forms of CSR communication to create a comprehensive environmental CSR profile that simultaneously enhances their position within the industrial field and offers buffering protection due to intraindustry homogeneity. Competitive advantage language is used to describe the quality, scope, and innovation of their environmental CSR as superior to other companies within their industry, particularly when communicating about technology and innovations regarding conservation efforts and manufacturing processes. Institutional language is used to describe governmental regulations and laws, industry standards for CSR reporting and expenditures, and type of CSR initiatives and partnerships. Finally, the form CSR communication takes is deeply contextualized by industry and institutional pressures as well as organizational idiosyncrasies thereby challenging the universality of CSR initiatives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)210-236
Number of pages27
JournalManagement Communication Quarterly
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2013

Keywords

  • corporate communication
  • corporate social responsibility
  • institutional theory
  • organizational communication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Black Gold, Green Earth: An Analysis of the Petroleum Industry's CSR Environmental Sustainability Discourse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this