Chromosome complement of the fungal plant pathogen Fusarium graminearum based on genetic and physical mapping and cytological observations

L. R. Gale, J. D. Bryant, S. Calvo, H. Giese, T. Katan, K. O'Donnell, H. Suga, M. Taga, T. R. Usgaard, T. J. Ward, H C Kistler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

101 Scopus citations

Abstract

A genetic map of the filamentous fungus Fusarium graminearum (teleomorph: Gibberella zeae) was constructed to both validate and augment the draft whole-genome sequence assembly of strain PH-1. A mapping population was created from a cross between mutants of the sequenced strain (PH-1, NRRL 31084, originally isolated from Michigan) and a field strain from Minnesota (00-676, NRRL 34097). A total of 111 ascospore progeny were analyzed for segregation at 235 loci. Genetic markers consisted of sequence-tagged sites, primarily detected as dCAPS or CAPS (n = 131) and VNTRs (n = 31), in addition to AFLPs (n = 66) and 7 other markers. While most markers exhibited Mendelian inheritance, segregation distortion was observed for 25 predominantly clustered markers. A linkage map was generated using the Kosambi mapping function, using a LOD threshold value of 3.5. Nine linkage groups were detected, covering 1234 cM and anchoring 99.83% of the draft sequence assembly. The nine linkage groups and the 22 anchored scaffolds from the sequence assembly could be assembled into four chromosomes, leaving only five smaller scaffolds (59,630 bp total) of the nuclear DNA unanchored. A chromosome number of four was confirmed by cytological karyotyping. Further analysis of the genetic map data identified variation in recombination rate in different genomic regions that often spanned several hundred kilobases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)985-1001
Number of pages17
JournalGenetics
Volume171
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chromosome complement of the fungal plant pathogen Fusarium graminearum based on genetic and physical mapping and cytological observations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this