TY - JOUR
T1 - Coaching Scales
T2 - A Review of the Literature and Comparative Analysis
AU - Hagen, Marcia S.
AU - Peterson, Shari L
PY - 2014/5
Y1 - 2014/5
N2 - The Problem. Given the relevance of scales for selecting managers, Peterson and Little called foran examination of scales used to measure coaching. However, there are few optionsfrom which to select validated scales used to measure coaching. Consequently, thereappears to be a knowledge gap-little is known about the coaching scales that areavailable and how they have been validated and tested.The Solution.A proposed solution to the issue is to (a) present a comprehensive review of theliterature, identifying coaching scales; (b) analyze those scales, providing informationon scale item development, reliability, and validation of available scales; and (c)compare and clarify the efficacy of those scales.The Stakeholders. This literature review will benefit academic scholars, practitioners, and scholarpractitionersby supporting and encouraging their research. Identification andclarification of the existing scales, their focus, and validation processes can bridge theresearch/theory-practice gap.
AB - The Problem. Given the relevance of scales for selecting managers, Peterson and Little called foran examination of scales used to measure coaching. However, there are few optionsfrom which to select validated scales used to measure coaching. Consequently, thereappears to be a knowledge gap-little is known about the coaching scales that areavailable and how they have been validated and tested.The Solution.A proposed solution to the issue is to (a) present a comprehensive review of theliterature, identifying coaching scales; (b) analyze those scales, providing informationon scale item development, reliability, and validation of available scales; and (c)compare and clarify the efficacy of those scales.The Stakeholders. This literature review will benefit academic scholars, practitioners, and scholarpractitionersby supporting and encouraging their research. Identification andclarification of the existing scales, their focus, and validation processes can bridge theresearch/theory-practice gap.
KW - coaching scale
KW - literature review
KW - survey instrument
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898909273&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898909273&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1523422313520203
DO - 10.1177/1523422313520203
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84898909273
SN - 1523-4223
VL - 16
SP - 222
EP - 241
JO - Advances in Developing Human Resources
JF - Advances in Developing Human Resources
IS - 2
ER -