Comment on “A statistical study of the central plasma sheet: Implications for substorm models”

C. A. Cattell, R. C. Elphic

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

We show that the conclusions of the above paper are seriously compromised by flaws in the methodology of the statistical study. In addition, the authors' definition of a physically significant flow is not consistent with the physics of the magnetotail.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)773-775
Number of pages3
JournalGeophysical Research Letters
Volume14
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1987

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on “A statistical study of the central plasma sheet: Implications for substorm models”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this