TY - JOUR
T1 - Communication breakdown
T2 - Clinicians disagree on subacromial impingement
AU - de Witte, Pieter Bas
AU - de Groot, Jurriaan H.
AU - van Zwet, Erik W.
AU - Ludewig, Paula M.
AU - Nagels, Jochem
AU - Nelissen, Rob G.H.H.
AU - Braman, Jon P.
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - "Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS)" is often used as a diagnostic label, but has become more controversial as such in the literature. We assessed views on SIS in clinical practice using a survey with 63 0-10 VAS items among orthopedic surgeons and physical therapists from the United States and the Netherlands. Multivariate regression and cluster analyses were applied to identify consensus items and to study profession and/or nationality effects on item ratings. Most items received neutral or highly variable ratings. Twenty-nine were considered associated with SIS, including worsening of pain with overhead activities, painful arc and a positive Neer's test. Seven items were regarded pleading against SIS, including loss of passive motion. Activity modifications and physical therapy are the most important treatments according to therapists, who highly valued motion-related etiologic mechanisms. Surgeons, with higher ratings for intrinsic and anatomic etiologies, appreciated the use of subacromial corticosteroids and surgery. Clinicians from different professional backgrounds have different views on what SIS is, and even within professional groups, variations are substantial. This has to be taken into account when communicating about SIS symptoms, for example, in intercollegial consultation or scientific research. The authors suggest cautious use of (subacromial) impingement syndrome as a diagnostic label.
AB - "Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS)" is often used as a diagnostic label, but has become more controversial as such in the literature. We assessed views on SIS in clinical practice using a survey with 63 0-10 VAS items among orthopedic surgeons and physical therapists from the United States and the Netherlands. Multivariate regression and cluster analyses were applied to identify consensus items and to study profession and/or nationality effects on item ratings. Most items received neutral or highly variable ratings. Twenty-nine were considered associated with SIS, including worsening of pain with overhead activities, painful arc and a positive Neer's test. Seven items were regarded pleading against SIS, including loss of passive motion. Activity modifications and physical therapy are the most important treatments according to therapists, who highly valued motion-related etiologic mechanisms. Surgeons, with higher ratings for intrinsic and anatomic etiologies, appreciated the use of subacromial corticosteroids and surgery. Clinicians from different professional backgrounds have different views on what SIS is, and even within professional groups, variations are substantial. This has to be taken into account when communicating about SIS symptoms, for example, in intercollegial consultation or scientific research. The authors suggest cautious use of (subacromial) impingement syndrome as a diagnostic label.
KW - Consensus
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Rotator cuff
KW - Shoulder impingement syndrome
KW - Treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896394779&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896394779&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11517-013-1075-0
DO - 10.1007/s11517-013-1075-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 23615729
AN - SCOPUS:84896394779
VL - 52
SP - 221
EP - 231
JO - Medical and biological engineering
JF - Medical and biological engineering
SN - 0140-0118
IS - 3
ER -