Comparison of Patient Age Groups in Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome: The Medicare Coverage with Evidence Development Study

Ehab Atallah, Brent Logan, Min Chen, Corey Cutler, Joachim Deeg, Meagan Jacoby, Richard Champlin, Taiga Nishihori, Dennis Confer, James Gajewski, Stephanie Farnia, Peter Greenberg, Erica Warlick, Daniel Weisdorf, Wael Saber, Mary M. Horowitz, J. Douglas Rizzo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Importance: In 2010, the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) indicated that data regarding efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) in the CMS beneficiary population with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were currently insufficient, but that coverage would be provided for patients enrolled in a clinical study that met its criteria for Coverage with Evidence Development (CED). Objective: The Center for International Bone Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) submitted a study concept comparing the outcomes of patients aged 55 to 64 years vs aged 65 years or older who met those criteria, effectively providing coverage by CMS for HCT for MDS. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data on patients aged 65 years or older were prospectively collected and their outcomes compared with patients aged 55 to 64 years. Patients were enrolled in the study from December 15, 2010, to May 14, 2014. The results reported herein were analyzed as of September 4, 2017, with a median follow-up of 47 months. The study was conducted by the CIBMTR. It comprises a voluntary working group of more than 420 centers worldwide that contribute detailed data on allogeneic and autologous HCT and cellular therapies. Interventions: Patients with MDS received HCT according to institutional guidelines and preferences. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse-free survival, and acute and chronic graft vs host disease. Results: During the study period, 688 patients aged 65 years or older underwent HCT for MDS and were compared with 592 patients aged 55 to 64 years. Other than age, there were no differences in patient and disease characteristics between the groups. On univariate analysis, the 3-year NRM rate was 28% vs 25% for the 65 years or older group vs those aged 55 to 64 years, respectively. The 3-year OS was 37% vs 42% for the 65 years or older group vs the 55 to 64 years age group, respectively. On multivariable analysis after adjusting for excess risk of mortality in the older group, age group had no significant association with OS (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.94-1.27; P =.23) or NRM (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.93-1.52; P =.16). Conclusions and Relevance: Older patients with MDS undergoing HCT have similar OS compared with younger patients. Based on current data, we would recommend coverage of HCT for MDS by the CMS. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01166009.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)486-493
Number of pages8
JournalJAMA Oncology
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Patient Age Groups in Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome: The Medicare Coverage with Evidence Development Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this