Comparison of tolerated and rejected islet grafts: A gene expression study

Tobias Berg, Tao Wu, Brett Levay-Young, Neal D Heuss, Yisheng Pan, Nicole Kirchhof, David E.R. Sutherland, Bernhard J Hering, Zhiguang Guo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recently we showed that donor-specific tolerance to MHC-matched islet allografts in diabetic NOD mice could be induced by simultaneous islet and bone marrow transplantation. Mononuclear cell infiltration surrounding the islets was also found in tolerated grafts. In this study, we compared gene expression in the tolerated and rejected islet grafts by using Affymetrix Murine U74A oligonucleotide arrays. To confirm the results of microarray analysis, we performed real-time PCR and RNase protection assay on selected genes. Of over 12,000 genes studied, 57 genes were expressed at consistently higher levels in tolerated islet grafts, and 524 genes in rejected islet grafts. Genes from a variety of functional clusters were found to be different between rejected and tolerated grafts. In the rejected islet grafts, a number of T-cell surface markers and of cytotoxicity-related genes were highly expressed. Also in the rejected grafts, a number of cytokines and chemokines and their receptors were highly expressed. The differential expression of selected genes found by microarray analysis was also confirmed by real-time PCR and RNase protection assay. Our results indicated that gene microarray analysis can help us to detect gene expression differences representative of the biologic mechanisms of tolerance and rejection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)619-629
Number of pages11
JournalCell transplantation
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

Keywords

  • Gene expression
  • Graft-infiltrating lymphocytes
  • Islets
  • NOD mice
  • Rejection
  • Tolerance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of tolerated and rejected islet grafts: A gene expression study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this