Conducting and interpreting high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Rajat Kalra, Pankaj Arora, Charity Morgan, Fadi G. Hage, Ami E. Iskandrian, Navkaranbir S. Bajaj

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are powerful tools for summarizing existing literature and combining evidence from multiple studies. These methods employ complex searches, statistical techniques, and presentation techniques with which the clinical audience may not be very familiar. This review article aims to familiarize the clinical audience with the various techniques employed to conduct a high-quality systematic review and meta-analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)471-481
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Nuclear Cardiology
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Keywords

  • Systematic review
  • meta-analysis
  • network meta-analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conducting and interpreting high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this