Abstract
The distinction between content and graphics in the ecological interface design (EID) is discussed. EID indicates what affordances should be represented in a display, but it provides little or no guidance about what the display should look like. EID is a theory of interface content and not a theory of interface graphics. The term graphics refers to the appearance of a display or what an interface looks like.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, Ergonomics for the New Millenium |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| State | Published - Dec 1 2000 |
| Event | Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium' - San Diego, CA, United States Duration: Jul 29 2000 → Aug 4 2000 |
Other
| Other | Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium' |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | San Diego, CA |
| Period | 7/29/00 → 8/4/00 |