Defining (and Denying) Diversity Through Interdistrict Choice

Kara S. Finnigan, Burke Scarbrough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Interdistrict choice programs are among the few policy mechanisms that work against segregation and inequality in the United States, but little research has examined these. This qualitative study examines one collaborative, analyzing how stakeholders' understandings of the program's purpose influence program decisions. It involves document review, observations, and interviews (n = 65). Our analysis suggests that different rationales for "diversity" are driving implementation today than those that undergirded its inception. A shift to "instrumental" rationales limits systemic orientations toward regional inequity by narrowly defining diversity and, ultimately, denying access to many students of Color who apply to cross district boundaries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)142-162
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of School Choice
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2013

Keywords

  • desegregation policy
  • diversity
  • equity
  • interdistrict choice
  • school choice

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Defining (and Denying) Diversity Through Interdistrict Choice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this