TY - JOUR
T1 - Defining Our Clinical Practice
T2 - The Identification of Genetic Counseling Outcomes Utilizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model
AU - Redlinger-Grosse, Krista
AU - Veach, Patricia Mc Carthy
AU - Cohen, Stephanie
AU - LeRoy, Bonnie S.
AU - MacFarlane, Ian M.
AU - Zierhut, Heather
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc.
Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - The need for evidence-based medicine, including comparative effectiveness studies and patient-centered outcomes research, has become a major healthcare focus. To date, a comprehensive list of genetic counseling outcomes, as espoused by genetic counselors, has not been established and thus, identification of outcomes unique to genetic counseling services has become a priority for the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC). The purpose of this study was to take a critical first step at identifying a more comprehensive list of genetic counseling outcomes. This paper describes the results of a focus group study using the Reciprocal-Engagement Model (REM) as a framework to characterize patient-centered outcomes of genetic counseling clinical practice. Five focus groups were conducted with 27 peer nominated participants who were clinical genetic counselors, genetic counseling program directors, and/or outcomes researchers in genetic counseling. Members of each focus group were asked to identify genetic counseling outcomes for four to five of the 17 goals of the REM. A theory-driven, thematic analysis of focus group data yielded 194 genetic counseling outcomes across the 17 goals. Participants noted some concerns about how genetic counseling outcomes will be measured and evaluated given varying stakeholders and the long-term nature of genetic concerns. The present results provide a list of outcomes for use in future genetic counseling outcomes research and for empirically-supported clinical interventions.
AB - The need for evidence-based medicine, including comparative effectiveness studies and patient-centered outcomes research, has become a major healthcare focus. To date, a comprehensive list of genetic counseling outcomes, as espoused by genetic counselors, has not been established and thus, identification of outcomes unique to genetic counseling services has become a priority for the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC). The purpose of this study was to take a critical first step at identifying a more comprehensive list of genetic counseling outcomes. This paper describes the results of a focus group study using the Reciprocal-Engagement Model (REM) as a framework to characterize patient-centered outcomes of genetic counseling clinical practice. Five focus groups were conducted with 27 peer nominated participants who were clinical genetic counselors, genetic counseling program directors, and/or outcomes researchers in genetic counseling. Members of each focus group were asked to identify genetic counseling outcomes for four to five of the 17 goals of the REM. A theory-driven, thematic analysis of focus group data yielded 194 genetic counseling outcomes across the 17 goals. Participants noted some concerns about how genetic counseling outcomes will be measured and evaluated given varying stakeholders and the long-term nature of genetic concerns. The present results provide a list of outcomes for use in future genetic counseling outcomes research and for empirically-supported clinical interventions.
KW - Focus group
KW - Genetic counseling
KW - Goals
KW - Outcomes
KW - Outcomes research
KW - Reciprocal-engagement model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961215540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961215540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10897-015-9864-2
DO - 10.1007/s10897-015-9864-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 26204965
AN - SCOPUS:84961215540
VL - 25
SP - 239
EP - 257
JO - Journal of Genetic Counseling
JF - Journal of Genetic Counseling
SN - 1059-7700
IS - 2
ER -