Denosumab in patients with giant-cell tumour of bone: an open-label, phase 2 study

David Thomas, Robert Henshaw, Keith Skubitz, Sant Chawla, Arthur Staddon, Jean Yves Blay, Martine Roudier, Judy Smith, Zhishen Ye, Winnie Sohn, Roger Dansey, Susie Jun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

398 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Giant-cell tumour (GCT) of bone is a primary osteolytic bone tumour with low metastatic potential and is associated with substantial skeletal morbidity. GCT is rich in osteoclast-like giant cells and contains mononuclear (stromal) cells that express RANK ligand (RANKL), a key mediator of osteoclast activation. We investigated the potential therapeutic effect of denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against RANKL, on tumour-cell survival and growth in patients with GCT. Methods: In this open-label, single-group study, 37 patients with recurrent or unresectable GCT were enrolled and received subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg monthly (every 28 days), with loading doses on days 8 and 15 of month 1. The primary endpoint was tumour response, defined as elimination of at least 90% of giant cells or no radiological progression of the target lesion up to week 25. Study recruitment is closed; patient treatment and follow-up are ongoing. The study is registered with Clinical Trials.gov, NCT00396279. Findings: Two patients had insufficient histology or radiology data for efficacy assessment. 30 of 35 (86%; 95% CI 70-95) of evaluable patients had a tumour response: 20 of 20 assessed by histology and 10 of 15 assessed by radiology. Adverse events were reported in 33 of 37 patients; the most common being pain in an extremity (n=7), back pain (n=4), and headache (n=4). Five patients had grade 3-5 adverse events, only one of which (grade 3 increase in human chorionic gonadotropin concentration not related to pregnancy) was deemed to be possibly treatment related. Five serious adverse events were reported although none were deemed treatment related. Interpretation: Further investigation of denosumab as a therapy for GCT is warranted. Funding: Amgen, Inc.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)275-280
Number of pages6
JournalThe Lancet Oncology
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was sponsored by Amgen, Inc. Medical writers Ting Chang and Linda Melvin were involved in all stages of the writing of this manuscript. Ting Chang is an employee of Amgen Inc; the freelance services of Linda Melvin were funded by Amgen Inc.

Funding Information:
DT has received consulting fees from Amgen Inc, research grants from Pfizer and Novartis, and is supported by a Victorian Cancer Agency Clinician Researcher fellowship. KS has received research funding, consulting fees, and/or honorarium from Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen Inc, Johnson and Johnson, SMI, Keryx, Ariad/Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Daiichi, Cell Therapeutics, Infinity, Schering Plough, and Cellgene, and has served as an expert witness involving bisphosphonates. J-YB has received consulting fees and honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, and PharmaMar, and research funding from Novartis. MR, JS, ZY, WS, RD, and SJ are employees of Amgen and have received Amgen stocks and stock options. The remaining authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Denosumab in patients with giant-cell tumour of bone: an open-label, phase 2 study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this