TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing a Conversation Aid to Support Shared Decision Making
T2 - Reflections on Designing Anticoagulation Choice
AU - Shared Decision Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators
AU - Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia L.
AU - Hargraves, Ian
AU - Noseworthy, Peter
AU - Branda, Megan E.
AU - Kunneman, Marleen
AU - Burnett, Bruce
AU - Gionfriddo, Michael R.
AU - McLeod, Christopher J.
AU - Gorr, Haeshik
AU - Brito, Juan Pablo
AU - Montori, Victor
AU - Montori, Victor
AU - Spencer-Bonilla, Gabriela
AU - Sivly, Angela L.
AU - Fleming, Kirsten
AU - Linzer, Mark
AU - Muegge, Jule
AU - Poplau, Sara
AU - Simpson, Benjamin
AU - Vang, Miamoua
AU - Wambua, Mike
AU - Anderson, Joel
AU - Behnken, Emma
AU - Bellolio, Fernanda
AU - Cabalka, Renee
AU - Ferrara, Michael
AU - Giblon, Rachel
AU - Hargraves, Ian
AU - Inselman, Jonathan
AU - LeBlanc, Annie
AU - Noseworthy, Peter
AU - Olive, Marc
AU - Organick, Paige
AU - Shah, Nilay
AU - Thota, Anjali
AU - Ting, Henry
AU - Vanmeter, Derek
AU - Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia
AU - Harvey, Lisa
AU - Keune, Shelly
AU - Guyatt, Gordon
AU - Haynes, Brian
AU - Tomlinson, George
AU - Daniels, Paul
AU - Gersh, Bernard
AU - Hess, Erik
AU - Jaeger, Thomas
AU - McBane, Robert
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - Patient-centered care requires that treatments respond to the problematic situation of each patient in a manner that makes intellectual, emotional, and practical sense, an achievement that requires shared decision making (SDM). To implement SDM in practice, tools—sometimes called conversation aids or decision aids—are prepared by collating, curating, and presenting high-quality, comprehensive, and up-to-date evidence. Yet, the literature offers limited guidance for how to make evidence support SDM. Herein, we describe our approach and the challenges encountered during the development of Anticoagulation Choice, a conversation aid to help patients with atrial fibrillation and their clinicians jointly consider the risk of thromboembolic stroke and decide whether and how to respond to this risk with anticoagulation.
AB - Patient-centered care requires that treatments respond to the problematic situation of each patient in a manner that makes intellectual, emotional, and practical sense, an achievement that requires shared decision making (SDM). To implement SDM in practice, tools—sometimes called conversation aids or decision aids—are prepared by collating, curating, and presenting high-quality, comprehensive, and up-to-date evidence. Yet, the literature offers limited guidance for how to make evidence support SDM. Herein, we describe our approach and the challenges encountered during the development of Anticoagulation Choice, a conversation aid to help patients with atrial fibrillation and their clinicians jointly consider the risk of thromboembolic stroke and decide whether and how to respond to this risk with anticoagulation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059782121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059782121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.030
DO - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.030
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30642640
AN - SCOPUS:85059782121
SN - 0025-6196
VL - 94
SP - 686
EP - 696
JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
IS - 4
ER -
