Diagnostic accuracy of physicians for identifying patients with acute myocardial infarction without an electrocardiogram: Experiences from the TEAHAT trial

Johan Herlitz, Björn W. Karlson, Thomas Karlsson, Mikael Dellborg, Marianne Hartford, Russell V Luepker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of physicians for identifying patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) without an electrocardiogram (ECG). Patients. All patients in Goteborg with suspected AMI below 75 years of age who called for an ambulance or came directly to one of the two city hospitals with a delay time of less than 2 h 45 min from the start of symptoms. Methods. As part of the TEAHAT study (comparing rt-PA and placebo in AMI), we asked physicians to judge on a 1-5 scale (I = no suspicion; 5 = convinced) how strong their suspicion of AMI was prior to interpreting the ECG. Results. Among patients evaluated outside hospital with 4 or 5 on the scale, i.e. either a strong suspicion of AMI or the physician felt convinced about the diagnosis, 45% had ST elevation and 48% developed AMI during the first 3 days in hospital. The corresponding values for patients evaluated in hospital were 67 and 70%, respectively. Conclusion. We found that physicians could not accurately distinguish patients with AMI from those without based on clinical criteria without the help of an ECG.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-27
Number of pages3
JournalCardiology (Switzerland)
Volume86
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

Keywords

  • Myocardial infarction
  • Prediction

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic accuracy of physicians for identifying patients with acute myocardial infarction without an electrocardiogram: Experiences from the TEAHAT trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this