Distraction Osteogenesis

James Sidman, Sherard Austin Tatum

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

James Sidman, MD, and Sherard A. Tatum, MD, address the following questions for discussion and debate. Is neonatal distraction osteogenesis (DO) better than lip-tongue adhesion or tracheotomy for micrognathic airway compromise? What role does DO have in adult orthognathic surgery situations? In monobloc and Le Fort III procedures, are internal or external devices preferable? What role does DO play in craniofacial microsomia? Is endoscopic DO better than open procedures for synostosis management? How has your technique changed or evolved over the past 5years and what has doing this technique taught you?.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-146
Number of pages8
JournalFacial plastic surgery clinics of North America
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2014

Keywords

  • Craniofacial surgery
  • Distraction osseogenesis
  • Distraction osteogenesis
  • Facial skeletal surgery
  • Maxillofacial surgery
  • Orthognathic surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Distraction Osteogenesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this