Effects of the mosquito larvicides temephos and methoprene on insect populations in experimental ponds

Alfred E. Pinkney, Peter C. McGowan, Daniel R. Murphy, T. Peter Lowe, Donald W. Sparling, Leonard C. Ferrington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

The nontarget effects of Abate® 4E (44.6% temephos) at 0.054 kg of active ingredient (a.i.) per 1 ha and of Altosid® Liquid Larvicide (5% methoprene) at 0.011 kg a.i./ha were investigated in 18 experimental ponds (average area, 202 m2; maximum depth, 0.7 m) at Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland, USA. Ponds were sprayed three times at 3-week intervals. Six ponds were sprayed with Abate, six with Altosid, and six with distilled water. Two insect-emergence traps per pond collected for 7 d and were then harvested 1 d before each spray and 13 to 14 days afterward. A repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant reductions in Shannon diversity, equitability, and numbers of individuals, species, and families in the Abate ponds relative to controls. Significant reductions also occurred in Ephemeroptera, Odonata, Diptera, Chironomidae, and Chaoborus sp. Hester-Dendy samplers were installed before spray one and harvested 16 d after spray three. Based on one-way ANOVA, Shannon diversity, equitability, and number of Ephemeroptera and Chironomidae were significantly reduced in the Abate ponds. Emergence data indicate only isolated cases with significant reductions in the Altosid ponds relative to controls, and the Hester-Dendy data indicate no significant differences between the Altosid and control ponds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)678-684
Number of pages7
JournalEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000

Keywords

  • Methoprene
  • Nontarget impacts Insects
  • Temephos

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of the mosquito larvicides temephos and methoprene on insect populations in experimental ponds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this