Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs other Achalasia treatments in improving esophageal function

Madhusudhan R. Sanaka, Umar Hayat, Prashanthi N. Thota, Ramprasad Jegadeesan, Monica Ray, Scott L. Gabbard, Neha Wadhwa, Rocio Lopez, Mark E. Baker, Sudish Murthy, Siva Raja

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations


AIM: To assess and compare the esophageal function after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs other conventional treatments in achalasia. METHODS: Chart review of all achalasia patients who underwent POEM, laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) or pneumatic dilation (PD) at our institution between January 2012 and March 2015 was performed. Patient demographics, type of achalasia, prior treatments, pre- and post-treatment timed barium swallow (TBE) and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) findings were compared between the three treatment groups. Patients who had both pre- and 2 mo posttreatment TBE or HREM were included in the final analysis. TBE parameters compared were barium column height, width and volume of barium remaining at 1 and 5 min. HREM parameters compared were basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressures and LES-integrated relaxation pressures (IRP). Data are presented as mean ± SD, median [25th, 75th percentiles] or frequency (percent). Analysis of variance, Kruskal- Wallis test, Pearsons X 2 test and Fishers Exact tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 200 achalasia patients were included of which 36 underwent POEM, 22 underwent PD and 142 underwent LHM. POEM patients were older (55.4 ± 16.8 years vs 46.5 ± 15.7 years, P = 0.013) and had higher BMI than LHM (29.1 ± 5.9 kg/m2 vs 26 ± 5.1 kg/m2, P = 0.012). More number of patients in POEM and PD groups had undergone prior treatments compared to LHM group (72.2% vs 68.2% vs 44.3% respectively, P = 0.003). At 2 mo post-treatment, all TBE parameters including barium column height, width and volume remaining at 1 and 5 min improved significantly in all three treatment groups (P = 0.01 to P < 0.001) except the column height at 1 min in PD group (P = 0.11) . At 2 mo post-treatment, there was significant improvement in basal LES pressure and LES-IRP in both LHM (40.5 mmHg vs 14.5 mmHg and 24 mmHg vs 7.1 mmHg respectively, P < 0.001) and POEM groups (38.7 mmHg vs 11.4 mmHg and 23.6 mmHg vs 6.6 mmHg respectively, P < 0.001). However, when the efficacy of three treatments were compared to each other in terms of improvement in TBE or HREM parameters at 2 mo, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: POEM, PD and LHM were all effective in improving esophageal function in achalasia at shortterm. There was no difference in efficacy between the three treatments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4918-4925
Number of pages8
JournalWorld journal of gastroenterology
Issue number20
StatePublished - May 28 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.

Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.


  • Achalasia
  • Dysphagia
  • Heller myotomy
  • Manometry
  • Peroral endoscopic myotomy
  • Pneumatic dilation


Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs other Achalasia treatments in improving esophageal function'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this