Abstract
Samples with analyte concentrations outside a method's dynamic range are a reality of clinical chemistry and are particularly of interest in method comparison studies. The most obvious remedy-to ignore any such values-introduces bias and loses the information that censored data might add to the analysis. Extending conventional errors-in-variables methods to incorporate value-censored data recovers this information. The formulation presented uses a variance model more flexible than either the constant variance or the constant coefficient of variation models.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 332-335 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Journal of Chemometrics |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 1 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords
- Method comparison
- Variance modeling
- Weighted Deming regression