TY - JOUR
T1 - Facial cosmetics
T2 - Trends and alternatives data from the American Contact Alternatives Group
AU - Scheman, Andrew
AU - Jacob, Sharon
AU - Katta, Rajani
AU - Nedorost, Susan
AU - Warshaw, Erin M
AU - Zirwas, Matt
AU - Cha, Christina
PY - 2011/6/1
Y1 - 2011/6/1
N2 - Objective: To provide updated data on usage of ingredients that are common potential contact allergens in several categories of facial cosmetics. To identify useful alternative products with few or no common contact allergens. Design: In November 2009, the full ingredient lists of 5,416 skin, hair, and cosmetic products marketed by the CVS pharmacy chain were copied from CVS.com into Microsoft Word format for analysis. Computer searches were made in Microsoft Word using search/replace and sorting functions to accurately identify the presence of specific allergens in each website product. Measurements: Percentages of American Contact Alternatives Group core series allergens were calculated. Results: The usage of American Contact Alternatives Group core series allergens in facial cosmetics is reported along with suitable alternative products for individuals with contact allergy. Conclusion: Data on allergen usage and alternatives for facial cosmetics is not widely published. This article reviews some of the common potential allergens in facial cosmetics, including blushers and bronzers, concealers, eyeliners, eyeshadows, foundations, loose and pressed powders, and mascaras. Suitable available alternative products for patients with contact allergy are listed.
AB - Objective: To provide updated data on usage of ingredients that are common potential contact allergens in several categories of facial cosmetics. To identify useful alternative products with few or no common contact allergens. Design: In November 2009, the full ingredient lists of 5,416 skin, hair, and cosmetic products marketed by the CVS pharmacy chain were copied from CVS.com into Microsoft Word format for analysis. Computer searches were made in Microsoft Word using search/replace and sorting functions to accurately identify the presence of specific allergens in each website product. Measurements: Percentages of American Contact Alternatives Group core series allergens were calculated. Results: The usage of American Contact Alternatives Group core series allergens in facial cosmetics is reported along with suitable alternative products for individuals with contact allergy. Conclusion: Data on allergen usage and alternatives for facial cosmetics is not widely published. This article reviews some of the common potential allergens in facial cosmetics, including blushers and bronzers, concealers, eyeliners, eyeshadows, foundations, loose and pressed powders, and mascaras. Suitable available alternative products for patients with contact allergy are listed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052137286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052137286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:80052137286
SN - 1941-2789
VL - 4
SP - 25
EP - 30
JO - Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology
JF - Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology
IS - 6
ER -