Factors associated with recovery of meat products following recalls due to Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli

S. A. Seys, F. Sampedro, C. W. Hedberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Food-product recall data for recalls due to Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) from 2000 to 2012 were obtained for establishments regulated by the United States Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). Statistical tests were used to assess the factors associated with recovery of product following STEC recalls along with the relationship between cluster detection and jurisdictions. Our results indicated that the percentage of recalled product recovered following a recall action due to STEC was dependent on the complexity of distribution, type of distribution, amount of time between production and recall dates, and the number of pounds of product recalled. Illness-related STEC recalls were associated with a lower percentage of product recovery which was probably impacted by larger amounts of product recalled, broader production scope, and delays from epidemiological and traceback investigations. Further, detection of illnesses related to STEC recalls seemed to be enhanced in states with additional resources and a history of successful foodborne investigations. This makes an argument for additional resources dedicated to public health agencies specifically for the surveillance of foodborne illnesses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2940-2947
Number of pages8
JournalEpidemiology and infection
Volume144
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Cambridge University Press 2016.

Keywords

  • Beef
  • Escherichia coli O157
  • Illness
  • Investigation
  • Outbreak
  • Recall
  • Stec

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Factors associated with recovery of meat products following recalls due to Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this