Free will and the obesity epidemic

David A. Levitsky, Carly R. Pacanowski

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

The increase in body weight in the USA over the past several decades is now commonly referred to as the 'obesity epidemic'. An empirical analysis of the literature suggests that the increased weight can be accounted for by an increase in food intake. The solution to the obesity epidemic, therefore, must centre on a reduction in food consumption, a position well accepted by the American population who think that they, as individuals, are responsible for their adiposity by holding the belief that the decision as to what and how much to eat is determined by their own free will. The evidence demonstrates, however, that this is not true. Variables such as portion size, variety of foods offered, fat content of the diet, the number of people eating, the location where eating occurs and even watching food advertisements act as 'food primes' causing individuals to increase their energy intake. Despite the plethora of diets, weight-loss clubs, drugs and mechanical devices available to facilitate weight loss, once treatment is terminated and people return to the 'free' environment, their weight returns to pre-treatment levels. Only when individuals are protected from environmental variables by gastric surgery or limited to consume only portion-controlled meals can they successfully maintain a reduced weight. Combining the technique of daily weight monitoring with accepting that our eating behaviour is not determined totally by our free choice, we may be able to curb the obesity epidemic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-141
Number of pages16
JournalPublic health nutrition
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Eating behaviour
  • Free choice
  • Free will
  • Obesity
  • Obesity epidemic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Free will and the obesity epidemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this