Gene expression analysis of related wheat lines with contrasting levels of head blight resistance after fusarium graminearum inoculation

Barbara Steiner, Katharina Schieszl, Ewelina Patrycja Litwicka, Harald Kurz, Marc Lemmens, Haiyan Jia, Gary Muehlbauer, Hermann Buerstmayr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Molecular mapping led to the identification of two major Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistance QTL, Fhb1 and Qfhs.ifa-5A. The actual function of the resistance genes is still unknown. The resistant line CM82036, the susceptible line Remus and six closely related lines were analyzed for differential gene expression after Fusarium attack. The related lines show contrasting levels of FHB resistance due to the possession of Fhb1 and Qfhs.ifa-5A. At anthesis plants were challenged by Fusarium graminearum or water and at six time points after inoculation gene expression of specific wheat floral tissue was analyzed by cDNAAFLPs and the Affymetrix Wheat GeneChip. 0.44% of the analyzed gene tags by cDNA-AFLPs displayed differential expressions after Fusarium attack depending on the genotype. Five of the gene tags were associated with the FHB resistance level of the enotypes and the possession of resistance alleles at Fhb1 and Qfhs.ifa-5A. These gene tags show homologies o a UDP-glucosyltransferase, wheat phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, DnaJ-like protein, pathogenesis-related family protein and a rice cDNA clone with unknown function. A thorough comparative analysis with the data ained by the Wheat GeneChip experiments is in progress.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-269
Number of pages3
JournalCereal Research Communications
Volume36
Issue numberSUPPL. 6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Keywords

  • CDNA-AFLP
  • Fusarium head blight
  • Gene expression analysis
  • Wheat

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gene expression analysis of related wheat lines with contrasting levels of head blight resistance after fusarium graminearum inoculation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this