TY - JOUR
T1 - General and specific measures in organizational behavior research
T2 - Considerations, examples, and recommendations for researchers
AU - Judge, Timothy A.
AU - Kammeyer-Mueller, John D.
PY - 2012/2
Y1 - 2012/2
N2 - Deliberation over and relative preference for general or specific (broad or narrow) constructs has long been an important issue in organizational behavior research. In this article, we provide a review of this general issue and some specific recommendations for researchers. We begin by discussing whether the general versus specific issue is an important debate and by discussing other underlying issues (the role of researcher preferences, distinction between reflective and formative indicators, and distinction between constructs and measures of constructs). Building on Chen's (this issue) analysis of core self-evaluations, we first discuss how the general-specific debate has progressed in core self-evaluations research. We then discuss three other important areas in which this debate has played out: intelligence, five-factor model of personality, and job attitudes. Finally, we offer a framework to help guide decisions about whether to utilize general measures, specific measures, or both and conclude by providing recommendations for the use of general and specific measures in organizational behavior research.
AB - Deliberation over and relative preference for general or specific (broad or narrow) constructs has long been an important issue in organizational behavior research. In this article, we provide a review of this general issue and some specific recommendations for researchers. We begin by discussing whether the general versus specific issue is an important debate and by discussing other underlying issues (the role of researcher preferences, distinction between reflective and formative indicators, and distinction between constructs and measures of constructs). Building on Chen's (this issue) analysis of core self-evaluations, we first discuss how the general-specific debate has progressed in core self-evaluations research. We then discuss three other important areas in which this debate has played out: intelligence, five-factor model of personality, and job attitudes. Finally, we offer a framework to help guide decisions about whether to utilize general measures, specific measures, or both and conclude by providing recommendations for the use of general and specific measures in organizational behavior research.
KW - Bandwidth-fidelity
KW - Broad and narrow measures
KW - Construct validity
KW - Core self-evaluations
KW - General and specific measures
KW - Intelligence
KW - Job attitudes
KW - Personality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855703787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855703787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/job.764
DO - 10.1002/job.764
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84855703787
SN - 0894-3796
VL - 33
SP - 161
EP - 174
JO - Journal of Organizational Behavior
JF - Journal of Organizational Behavior
IS - 2
ER -