TY - JOUR
T1 - How much progress have we made? Trends in disparities in tobacco use
AU - Kingsbury, J. H.
AU - D'Silva, J.
AU - O'Gara, E.
AU - Parks, M. J.
AU - Boyle, R. G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020.
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - Introduction Reducing tobacco-related health disparities has been a public health priority for more than 2 decades, yet disparities in cigarette use have remained steady or worsened. Less is known about how disparities in other tobacco products have changed over time. Our study examined trends in cigarette and other tobacco product use in Minnesota with the goal of informing efforts aimed at reducing disparities. Methods We examined tobacco use disparities as a function of education, income, and race across the Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey results in 2010 (N = 7,057), 2014 (N = 9,304), and 2018 (N = 6,055). Tobacco use was captured by assessing past 30-day use of 4 tobacco products: cigarettes, cigars, e-cigarettes, and smokeless tobacco, plus combustibles (ie, cigarettes and/or cigars) and any tobacco (ie, use of any of the 4 products). Results At each wave, those with lower income and education reported greater use of cigarettes, combustibles, and any tobacco than those with higher income and education. Black respondents were more likely to report cigar and combustibles use than White respondents in 2018, whereas White respondents were more likely to report smokeless tobacco use in 2014. We saw no significant waveby-demographic interactions, suggesting that the magnitude of the disparity remained unchanged over time for any tobacco product. Conclusion Substantial disparities in tobacco use remain across education, income, and race, even in a state such as Minnesota with a strong tobacco control program. Additional efforts are needed to close disparity gaps and reach endgame tobacco use targets for all subpopulations.
AB - Introduction Reducing tobacco-related health disparities has been a public health priority for more than 2 decades, yet disparities in cigarette use have remained steady or worsened. Less is known about how disparities in other tobacco products have changed over time. Our study examined trends in cigarette and other tobacco product use in Minnesota with the goal of informing efforts aimed at reducing disparities. Methods We examined tobacco use disparities as a function of education, income, and race across the Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey results in 2010 (N = 7,057), 2014 (N = 9,304), and 2018 (N = 6,055). Tobacco use was captured by assessing past 30-day use of 4 tobacco products: cigarettes, cigars, e-cigarettes, and smokeless tobacco, plus combustibles (ie, cigarettes and/or cigars) and any tobacco (ie, use of any of the 4 products). Results At each wave, those with lower income and education reported greater use of cigarettes, combustibles, and any tobacco than those with higher income and education. Black respondents were more likely to report cigar and combustibles use than White respondents in 2018, whereas White respondents were more likely to report smokeless tobacco use in 2014. We saw no significant waveby-demographic interactions, suggesting that the magnitude of the disparity remained unchanged over time for any tobacco product. Conclusion Substantial disparities in tobacco use remain across education, income, and race, even in a state such as Minnesota with a strong tobacco control program. Additional efforts are needed to close disparity gaps and reach endgame tobacco use targets for all subpopulations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091264474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091264474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5888/PCD17.200090
DO - 10.5888/PCD17.200090
M3 - Article
C2 - 32945768
AN - SCOPUS:85091264474
SN - 1545-1151
VL - 17
JO - Preventing Chronic Disease
JF - Preventing Chronic Disease
M1 - E107
ER -