TY - JOUR
T1 - "I saw a nightmare ⋯"
T2 - Violence and the construction of memory (Soweto, June 16, 1976)
AU - Pohlandt-MCCormick, Helena
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - The protests on June 16, 1976 of black schoolchildren in Soweto against the imposition of Afrikaans as a medium of instruction in their schools precipitated one of the most profound challenges to the South African apartheid state. These events were experienced in a context of violent social and political conflict. They were almost immediately drawn into a discourse that discredited and silenced them, manipulating meaning for ideological and political reasons with little regard for how language and its absence - silences - further violated those who had experienced the events. Violence, in its physical and discursive shape, forged individual memories that remain torn with pain, anger, distrust, and open questions; collective memories that left few spaces for ambiguity; and official or public histories tarnished by their political agendas or the very structures-and sources-that produced them. Based on oral histories and historical documents, this article discusses the collusion of violence and silence and its consequences. It argues that-while the collusion between violence and silence might appear to disrupt or, worse, destroy the ability of individuals to think historically-the individual historical actor can and does have the will to contest and engage with collective memory and official history.
AB - The protests on June 16, 1976 of black schoolchildren in Soweto against the imposition of Afrikaans as a medium of instruction in their schools precipitated one of the most profound challenges to the South African apartheid state. These events were experienced in a context of violent social and political conflict. They were almost immediately drawn into a discourse that discredited and silenced them, manipulating meaning for ideological and political reasons with little regard for how language and its absence - silences - further violated those who had experienced the events. Violence, in its physical and discursive shape, forged individual memories that remain torn with pain, anger, distrust, and open questions; collective memories that left few spaces for ambiguity; and official or public histories tarnished by their political agendas or the very structures-and sources-that produced them. Based on oral histories and historical documents, this article discusses the collusion of violence and silence and its consequences. It argues that-while the collusion between violence and silence might appear to disrupt or, worse, destroy the ability of individuals to think historically-the individual historical actor can and does have the will to contest and engage with collective memory and official history.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141447154&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141447154&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/0018-2656.00144
DO - 10.1111/0018-2656.00144
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:0141447154
SN - 0018-2656
VL - 39
SP - 23
EP - 44
JO - History and Theory
JF - History and Theory
IS - 4
ER -