Impact of nicotine reduction in cigarettes on smoking behavior and exposure: Are there differences by race/ethnicity, educational attainment, or gender?

Dana M. Carroll, Bruce R. Lindgren, Sarah S. Dermody, Rachel Denlinger-Apte, Andrew Egbert, Rachel N. Cassidy, Tracy T. Smith, Lauren R. Pacek, Alicia M. Allen, Jennifer W. Tidey, Michael J. Parks, Joseph S. Koopmeiners, Eric C. Donny, Dorothy K. Hatsukami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Lowering nicotine in cigarettes may reduce smoking prevalences; however, it is not known whether an immediate or gradual reduction in nicotine is the optimal approach for all population groups. Objectives: We examined whether the optimal approach to nicotine reduction depended on the education, gender, or race of people who smoke and whether the optimal approach differentially benefited people who smoke based on their education, gender, or race. Methods: Secondary analysis was conducted on a randomized clinical trial (N = 1250) comparing (1) immediate reduction from 15.5 to 0.4 mg of nicotine per gram of tobacco(mg/g);(2) gradual reduction to 0.4 mg/g;(3) control group with normal nicotine cigarettes(15.5 mg/g). Outcomes included cigarettes per day(CPD), carbon monoxide(CO), total nicotine equivalents(TNE), 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol and its glucuronides(NNAL), phenanthrene tetraol(PheT), N-Acetyl-S-(2-cyanoethyl)-L-cysteine(CEMA). Data were analyzed as area under the curve(AUC). Results: Results were presented by education (High school[HS] or less n = 505, more than HS n = 745), gender (males n = 701, females n = 549), and race (Black participants n = 373,White participants n = 758). Regardless of education, gender, and race, CPD, CO, TNE, NNAL, PheT, and CEMA were lower in immediate versus gradual nicotine reduction. Comparing immediate versus the control, outcomes were lower for all subgroups; however, the magnitude of the effect for TNE varied by race. Specifically, geometric mean of the AUC of TNE in immediate versus gradual was 49 % lower in Black participants and 61 % lower in White participants (p-value = 0.047). Conclusions: Immediately reducing nicotine in cigarettes has the potential to benefit people who smoke across lower and higher educational attainment, male and female gender, and Black and White race.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number108756
JournalDrug and alcohol dependence
Volume225
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Funding was provided by the National Institutes of Health (Award U54 DA031659 , K01DA047433 ; K01DA043413 ; K01MD014795 ). This content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the Food and Drug Administration. No potential competing interest was reported by the authors

Funding Information:
Funding was provided by the National Institutes of Health (Award U54 DA031659, K01DA047433; K01DA043413; K01MD014795). This content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the Food and Drug Administration. No potential competing interest was reported by the authors

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.

Keywords

  • Gender differences
  • Health disparities
  • Minoritized groups
  • Nicotine
  • Tobacco control
  • Tobacco regulatory science

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of nicotine reduction in cigarettes on smoking behavior and exposure: Are there differences by race/ethnicity, educational attainment, or gender?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this