Impact on staff of improving access to the school breakfast program: A qualitative study

Blair Haesly, Marilyn S. Nanney, Sara Coulter, Sherri Fong, Rebekah J. Pratt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Project BREAK! was designed to test the efficacy of an intervention to increase student participation in the reimbursable School Breakfast Program (SBP). Two schools developed grab-n-go menus, added convenient serving locations, and allowed eating in the hallway. This follow-up study investigated faculty and staff perspectives of how the SBP changes influenced schools. METHODS: Project BREAK! high schools were located near Minneapolis, Minnesota, enrolled over 1200 students each and were 70% to 90% white. Interviews with school personnel (N=11) and focus groups with teachers (N=16) from the 2 intervention schools were conducted. The Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) framework guided the question development. RESULTS: Analysis of the interviews identified the following DOI constructs as most prominently mentioned by school personnel and teachers: advantages for students and faculty/staff, minimal staff time required, communication of the changes, support of social relations between students and faculty/staff and trialability of the program. CONCLUSION: There appears to be numerous advantages for both students and school personnel to improving SBP access. The relative advantages of Project BREAK! appear to outweigh the negatives associated with extra time and effort required by staff. Communication about the changes is an area that needs strengthening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-274
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of School Health
Volume84
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2014

Keywords

  • Diffusion of innovation
  • Qualitative research
  • School breakfast

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact on staff of improving access to the school breakfast program: A qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this