In suspected SARS-CoV-2, rapid antigen detection tests had 67% to 73% sensitivity and 98% to 100% specificity

Steven D. Stovitz

doi:10.7326/ACPJ202105180-056

In suspected SARS-CoV-2, rapid antigen detection tests had 67% to 73% sensitivity and 98% to 100% specificity

Steven D. Stovitz

Family Medicine and Community Health (Twin Cities)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

SOURCE CITATION: Favresse J, Gillot C, Oliveira M, et al. Head-to-head comparison of rapid and automated antigen detection tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Clin Med. 2021;10:265. 33450853.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	JC56
Journal	Annals of internal medicine
Volume	174
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.7326/ACPJ202105180-056
State	Published - May 1 2021

PubMed: MeSH publication types

Journal Article
Comment

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access

10.7326/ACPJ202105180-056

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

@article{5d013a22dc6641679209421f9c4c1ddb,

title = "In suspected SARS-CoV-2, rapid antigen detection tests had 67% to 73% sensitivity and 98% to 100% specificity",

abstract = "SOURCE CITATION: Favresse J, Gillot C, Oliveira M, et al. Head-to-head comparison of rapid and automated antigen detection tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Clin Med. 2021;10:265. 33450853.",

author = "Stovitz, {Steven D.}",

year = "2021",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.7326/ACPJ202105180-056",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "174",

pages = "JC56",

journal = "Annals of internal medicine",

issn = "0003-4819",

publisher = "American College of Physicians",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In suspected SARS-CoV-2, rapid antigen detection tests had 67% to 73% sensitivity and 98% to 100% specificity

AU - Stovitz, Steven D.

PY - 2021/5/1

Y1 - 2021/5/1

N2 - SOURCE CITATION: Favresse J, Gillot C, Oliveira M, et al. Head-to-head comparison of rapid and automated antigen detection tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Clin Med. 2021;10:265. 33450853.

AB - SOURCE CITATION: Favresse J, Gillot C, Oliveira M, et al. Head-to-head comparison of rapid and automated antigen detection tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Clin Med. 2021;10:265. 33450853.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106547751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85106547751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7326/ACPJ202105180-056

DO - 10.7326/ACPJ202105180-056

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 33939481

AN - SCOPUS:85106547751

SN - 0003-4819

VL - 174

SP - JC56

JO - Annals of internal medicine

JF - Annals of internal medicine

IS - 5

ER -

In suspected SARS-CoV-2, rapid antigen detection tests had 67% to 73% sensitivity and 98% to 100% specificity

Abstract

PubMed: MeSH publication types

UN SDGs

Access

OpenUrl availability

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this