Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population: Participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a fit mailing program

Jennifer A. Schlichting; Michelle A. Mengeling; Nader M. Makki; Ashish Malhotra; Thorvardur R. Halfdanarson; J. Stacey Klutts; Barcey T. Levy; Peter J. Kaboli; Mary E. Charlton

doi:10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1

Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population: Participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a fit mailing program

Jennifer A. Schlichting, Michelle A. Mengeling, Nader M. Makki, Ashish Malhotra, Thorvardur R. Halfdanarson, J. Stacey Klutts, Barcey T. Levy, Peter J. Kaboli, Mary E. Charlton

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Many people who live in rural areas face distance barriers to colonoscopy. Our previous study demonstrated the utility of mailing fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) to average risk patients overdue for colorectal cancer (CRC screening). The aims of this study were to determine if introductory and reminder telephone calls would increase the proportion of returned FITs as well as to compare costs. Average risk patients overdue for CRC screening received a high intensity intervention (HII), which included an introductory telephone call to see if they were interested in taking a FIT prior to mailing the test out and reminder phone calls if the FIT was not returned. This HII group was compared to our previous low intensity intervention (LII) where a FIT was mailed to a similar group of veterans with no telephone contact. While a higher proportion of eligible respondents returned FITs in the LII (92 vs. 45 %), there was a much higher proportion of FITs returned out of those mailed in the HII (85 vs. 14 %). The fewer wasted FITs in the HII led to it having lower cost per FIT returned (27.43 vs. 44.86). Given that either intervention is a feasible approach for patients overdue for CRC screening, health care providers should consider offering FITs using a home-based mailing program along with other evidence-based CRC screening options to average risk patients. Factors such as location, patient population, FIT cost and reimbursement, and personnel costs need to be considered when deciding the most effective way to implement FIT screening.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	239-247
Number of pages	9
Journal	Journal of Community Health
Volume	39
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1
State	Published - Apr 2014
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Stacy Wittrock and Ashley Cozad for their efforts in coordinating this study. We would also like to acknowledge Lindsey Davenport-Landry in the Iowa City VA laboratory for her work in managing all of the laboratory aspects of this project. The research reported here was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Central Region (VRHRC-CR), and the VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Service, Center for Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) (CIN 13–412). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

Keywords

Colorectal cancer screening
Cost comparison
Fecal immunochemical test
Intervention

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access

10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

Schlichting, J. A., Mengeling, M. A., Makki, N. M., Malhotra, A., Halfdanarson, T. R., Klutts, J. S., Levy, B. T., Kaboli, P. J., & Charlton, M. E. (2014). Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population: Participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a fit mailing program. Journal of Community Health, 39(2), 239-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1

Schlichting, JA, Mengeling, MA, Makki, NM, Malhotra, A, Halfdanarson, TR, Klutts, JS, Levy, BT, Kaboli, PJ & Charlton, ME 2014, 'Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population: Participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a fit mailing program', Journal of Community Health, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 239-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1

@article{8a02c0d9c0814dbcb11610723a00d18a,

title = "Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population: Participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a fit mailing program",

abstract = "Many people who live in rural areas face distance barriers to colonoscopy. Our previous study demonstrated the utility of mailing fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) to average risk patients overdue for colorectal cancer (CRC screening). The aims of this study were to determine if introductory and reminder telephone calls would increase the proportion of returned FITs as well as to compare costs. Average risk patients overdue for CRC screening received a high intensity intervention (HII), which included an introductory telephone call to see if they were interested in taking a FIT prior to mailing the test out and reminder phone calls if the FIT was not returned. This HII group was compared to our previous low intensity intervention (LII) where a FIT was mailed to a similar group of veterans with no telephone contact. While a higher proportion of eligible respondents returned FITs in the LII (92 vs. 45 %), there was a much higher proportion of FITs returned out of those mailed in the HII (85 vs. 14 %). The fewer wasted FITs in the HII led to it having lower cost per FIT returned (27.43 vs. 44.86). Given that either intervention is a feasible approach for patients overdue for CRC screening, health care providers should consider offering FITs using a home-based mailing program along with other evidence-based CRC screening options to average risk patients. Factors such as location, patient population, FIT cost and reimbursement, and personnel costs need to be considered when deciding the most effective way to implement FIT screening.",

keywords = "Colorectal cancer screening, Cost comparison, Fecal immunochemical test, Intervention",

author = "Schlichting, {Jennifer A.} and Mengeling, {Michelle A.} and Makki, {Nader M.} and Ashish Malhotra and Halfdanarson, {Thorvardur R.} and Klutts, {J. Stacey} and Levy, {Barcey T.} and Kaboli, {Peter J.} and Charlton, {Mary E.}",

note = "Funding Information: Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Stacy Wittrock and Ashley Cozad for their efforts in coordinating this study. We would also like to acknowledge Lindsey Davenport-Landry in the Iowa City VA laboratory for her work in managing all of the laboratory aspects of this project. The research reported here was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Central Region (VRHRC-CR), and the VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Service, Center for Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) (CIN 13–412). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.",

year = "2014",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "39",

pages = "239--247",

journal = "Journal of Community Health",

issn = "0094-5145",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population

T2 - Participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a fit mailing program

AU - Schlichting, Jennifer A.

AU - Mengeling, Michelle A.

AU - Makki, Nader M.

AU - Malhotra, Ashish

AU - Halfdanarson, Thorvardur R.

AU - Klutts, J. Stacey

AU - Levy, Barcey T.

AU - Kaboli, Peter J.

AU - Charlton, Mary E.

N1 - Funding Information: Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Stacy Wittrock and Ashley Cozad for their efforts in coordinating this study. We would also like to acknowledge Lindsey Davenport-Landry in the Iowa City VA laboratory for her work in managing all of the laboratory aspects of this project. The research reported here was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Central Region (VRHRC-CR), and the VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Service, Center for Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) (CIN 13–412). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

N2 - Many people who live in rural areas face distance barriers to colonoscopy. Our previous study demonstrated the utility of mailing fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) to average risk patients overdue for colorectal cancer (CRC screening). The aims of this study were to determine if introductory and reminder telephone calls would increase the proportion of returned FITs as well as to compare costs. Average risk patients overdue for CRC screening received a high intensity intervention (HII), which included an introductory telephone call to see if they were interested in taking a FIT prior to mailing the test out and reminder phone calls if the FIT was not returned. This HII group was compared to our previous low intensity intervention (LII) where a FIT was mailed to a similar group of veterans with no telephone contact. While a higher proportion of eligible respondents returned FITs in the LII (92 vs. 45 %), there was a much higher proportion of FITs returned out of those mailed in the HII (85 vs. 14 %). The fewer wasted FITs in the HII led to it having lower cost per FIT returned (27.43 vs. 44.86). Given that either intervention is a feasible approach for patients overdue for CRC screening, health care providers should consider offering FITs using a home-based mailing program along with other evidence-based CRC screening options to average risk patients. Factors such as location, patient population, FIT cost and reimbursement, and personnel costs need to be considered when deciding the most effective way to implement FIT screening.

AB - Many people who live in rural areas face distance barriers to colonoscopy. Our previous study demonstrated the utility of mailing fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) to average risk patients overdue for colorectal cancer (CRC screening). The aims of this study were to determine if introductory and reminder telephone calls would increase the proportion of returned FITs as well as to compare costs. Average risk patients overdue for CRC screening received a high intensity intervention (HII), which included an introductory telephone call to see if they were interested in taking a FIT prior to mailing the test out and reminder phone calls if the FIT was not returned. This HII group was compared to our previous low intensity intervention (LII) where a FIT was mailed to a similar group of veterans with no telephone contact. While a higher proportion of eligible respondents returned FITs in the LII (92 vs. 45 %), there was a much higher proportion of FITs returned out of those mailed in the HII (85 vs. 14 %). The fewer wasted FITs in the HII led to it having lower cost per FIT returned (27.43 vs. 44.86). Given that either intervention is a feasible approach for patients overdue for CRC screening, health care providers should consider offering FITs using a home-based mailing program along with other evidence-based CRC screening options to average risk patients. Factors such as location, patient population, FIT cost and reimbursement, and personnel costs need to be considered when deciding the most effective way to implement FIT screening.

KW - Colorectal cancer screening

KW - Cost comparison

KW - Fecal immunochemical test

KW - Intervention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896397304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896397304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1

DO - 10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 24499966

AN - SCOPUS:84896397304

SN - 0094-5145

VL - 39

SP - 239

EP - 247

JO - Journal of Community Health

JF - Journal of Community Health

IS - 2

ER -

Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population: Participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a fit mailing program

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access

OpenUrl availability

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this