Information transparency and coordination failure: Theory and experiment

Regina M. Anctil, John Dickhaut, Chandra Kanodia, Brian Shapiro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations


We examine the effect of higher order beliefs on the ability of decentralized decision makers to coordinate and take advantage of improvements in information transparency that can increase welfare. Theories that address this question have not been empirically explored. We study coordination in a laboratory experiment with privately informed decision makers. Economic outcomes in the setting depend both on agents' rational beliefs regarding economic fundamentals and on their rational beliefs regarding the beliefs of other agents. Increasing information transparency mitigates uncertainty about economic fundamentals but may increase strategic uncertainty, precipitating multiple equilibria and less efficient group outcomes. We provide evidence that sometimes the equilibrium attained by creditors is inferior from a welfare perspective to other available equilibria. Risk dominance appears to determine equilibrium selection in our setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-195
Number of pages37
JournalJournal of Accounting Research
Issue number2
StatePublished - May 1 2004

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Information transparency and coordination failure: Theory and experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this