TY - JOUR
T1 - Institutional affiliations of contributors to scholarly and professional activities in counseling psychology
T2 - 1980-1983
AU - Skovholt, Thomas M.
AU - Stone, Gerald L.
AU - Hill, Clara E.
PY - 1984/7
Y1 - 1984/7
N2 - Used presentations at Division 17 programs of the American Psychological Association conventions, affiliations of authors of articles in the Journal of Counseling Psychology and The Counseling Psychologist, and Division 17 leaders to determine that the University of Maryland (College Park), Ohio State University, and the University of Iowa were the most highly active institutions in counseling psychology over the period 1980-1983. The size of the faculty and faculty rewards and pressures appear to be factors in determining ratings. Counseling psychologists in nonacademic settings are disadvantaged in making research contributions by these factors. Since most current counseling and clinical psychology graduate students are trained to be practitioners, it is suggested that research and professional leadership dimensions should be measured on their value to practitioners. It is further suggested that quality of supervision, knowledge of practitioner skills, and capacity to meet credentialing and/or licensing requirements should be included in evaluating graduate education in counseling psychology. (13 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
AB - Used presentations at Division 17 programs of the American Psychological Association conventions, affiliations of authors of articles in the Journal of Counseling Psychology and The Counseling Psychologist, and Division 17 leaders to determine that the University of Maryland (College Park), Ohio State University, and the University of Iowa were the most highly active institutions in counseling psychology over the period 1980-1983. The size of the faculty and faculty rewards and pressures appear to be factors in determining ratings. Counseling psychologists in nonacademic settings are disadvantaged in making research contributions by these factors. Since most current counseling and clinical psychology graduate students are trained to be practitioners, it is suggested that research and professional leadership dimensions should be measured on their value to practitioners. It is further suggested that quality of supervision, knowledge of practitioner skills, and capacity to meet credentialing and/or licensing requirements should be included in evaluating graduate education in counseling psychology. (13 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
KW - contributors to "Journal of Counseling Psychology" & "The Counseling Psychologist" & their institutional affiliates, US, 1980-83
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047681164&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047681164&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/0022-0167.31.3.394
DO - 10.1037/0022-0167.31.3.394
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85047681164
SN - 0022-0167
VL - 31
SP - 394
EP - 397
JO - Journal of counseling psychology
JF - Journal of counseling psychology
IS - 3
ER -