Interpretation of charcoal morphotypes in sediments from Ferry Lake, Wisconsin, USA: Do different plant fuel sources produce distinctive charcoal morphotypes?

Katie Jensen, Elizabeth A. Lynch, Randy Calcote, Sara C. Hotchkiss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

89 Scopus citations

Abstract

We describe five common charcoal morphotypes observed in late-Holocene lake sediments from northern Wisconsin and compare them with charcoal produced by burning modern plant material. Our experiments show that grass cuticle, conifer wood and leaves of some broadleaved taxa all produce recognizable charcoal types that are preserved in sediments. We use the identification of charcoal morphotypes to enhance our interpretation of a previously published charcoal record from Ferry Lake, Wisconsin. The occurrence of the different charcoal morphotypes changed as the vegetation and fire regimes changed over the past 2300 yr. Charred grass cuticle was more common before 1300 cal. yr BP when small charcoal peaks were frequent and the pollen assemblage suggests that an open oak savanna surrounded the lake. Charcoal with bordered pits produced from burned conifer wood was more common after 1300 cal. yr BP, when red/jack pine pollen increased and the frequency of charcoal peaks decreased, suggesting a switch from a surface fire regime to one with less frequent crown fires. Our results suggest that stratigraphic changes in the occurrence of charcoal morphotypes can improve our understanding of past vegetation and fire regimes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)907-915
Number of pages9
JournalHolocene
Volume17
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Keywords

  • Charcoal morphology
  • Charcoal morphotypes
  • Fire history
  • Fuel sources
  • Lacustrine sediments
  • Late Holocene
  • Sand plain
  • Vegetation history
  • Wisconsin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interpretation of charcoal morphotypes in sediments from Ferry Lake, Wisconsin, USA: Do different plant fuel sources produce distinctive charcoal morphotypes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this