TY - JOUR
T1 - Interruptions and task transitions
T2 - Understanding their characteristics, processes, and consequences
AU - Leroy, Sophie
AU - Schmidt, Aaron M.
AU - Madjar, Nora
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - Frequent interruptions and task transitions are an inescapable reality of modern organizational life, yet the relevant research spans across numerous seemingly discon-nected domains that paint an incomplete and often inconsistent picture regarding the detrimental and/or beneficial consequences of such transitions, thus undermining the potential for this body of research to inform theory and practice. In this study, we review research relevant to interruptions such as intrusions, breaks, distractions, and dis-crepancies, as well as relevant work on multitasking and multiple goal self-regulation. In so doing, we identify ambiguities in the existing literature, and shed light on shared and unshared features across studies and fields to bring some coherence and start reconciling existing knowledge. At a theoretical level, our review reveals that behaviors on a task and the related interruptions and task transitions cannot be fully understood without taking into account the system of goals, within which they are embedded. We highlight that how people decide what to pay attention to and when to stop a goal pursuit to engage in another; have important emotional, cognitive, and performance implica-tions; and provide directions for advancing knowledge on interruptions and task transitions.
AB - Frequent interruptions and task transitions are an inescapable reality of modern organizational life, yet the relevant research spans across numerous seemingly discon-nected domains that paint an incomplete and often inconsistent picture regarding the detrimental and/or beneficial consequences of such transitions, thus undermining the potential for this body of research to inform theory and practice. In this study, we review research relevant to interruptions such as intrusions, breaks, distractions, and dis-crepancies, as well as relevant work on multitasking and multiple goal self-regulation. In so doing, we identify ambiguities in the existing literature, and shed light on shared and unshared features across studies and fields to bring some coherence and start reconciling existing knowledge. At a theoretical level, our review reveals that behaviors on a task and the related interruptions and task transitions cannot be fully understood without taking into account the system of goals, within which they are embedded. We highlight that how people decide what to pay attention to and when to stop a goal pursuit to engage in another; have important emotional, cognitive, and performance implica-tions; and provide directions for advancing knowledge on interruptions and task transitions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090651551&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090651551&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5465/annals.2017.0146
DO - 10.5465/annals.2017.0146
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85090651551
SN - 1941-6520
VL - 14
SP - 661
EP - 694
JO - Academy of Management Annals
JF - Academy of Management Annals
IS - 2
ER -