Intraindividual and interspecies variation in the 5S rDNA of coregonid fish

S. Linn Sajdak, Kent M. Reed, Ruth B. Phillips

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

95 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study was designed to characterize further the nontranscribed intergenic spacers (NTSs) of the 5S rRNA genes of fish and evaluate this marker as a tool for comparative studies. Two members of the closely related North American Great Lakes cisco species complex (Coregonus artedi and C. zenithicus) were chosen for comparison. Fluorescence in situ hybridization found the ciscoes to have a single multicopy 5S locus located in a C band- positive region of the largest submetacentric chromosome. The entire NTS was amplified from the two species by polymerase chain reaction with oligonucleotide primers anchored in the conserved 5S coding region. Complete sequences were determined for 25 clones from four individuals representing two discrete NTS length variants. Sequence analysis found the length variants to result from presence of a 130-bp direct repeat. No two sequences from a single fish were identical. Examination of sequence from the coding region revealed two types of 5S genes in addition to pseudogenes. This suggests the presence of both somatic and germline (oocyte) forms of the 5S gene in the genome of Coregonus. The amount of variation present among NTS sequences indicates that accumulation of variation (mutation) is greater in this multicopy gene than is gene conversion (homogenization). The high level of sequence variation makes the 5S NTS an inappropriate DNA sequence for comparisons of closely related taxa.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)680-688
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Molecular Evolution
Volume46
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 23 1998

Keywords

  • 5S ribosomal DNA
  • Coregonus
  • Nontranscribed spacer region

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Intraindividual and interspecies variation in the 5S rDNA of coregonid fish'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this