Loss of myocyte enhancer factor 2 expression in osteoclasts leads to opposing skeletal phenotypes

Nicholas Blixt, Andrew Norton, Anqi Zhang, Conrado Aparicio, Hari Prasad, Rajaram Gopalakrishnan, Eric D. Jensen, Kim C. Mansky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Osteoclasts are multinuclear cells that resorb bone. Osteoclast differentiation is regulated by multiple transcription factors which may be acting in a single or multiple factor complex to regulate gene expression. Myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) is a family of transcription factors whose role during osteoclast differentiation has not been well characterized. Because MEF2A and MEF2D are the family members most highly expressed during osteoclast differentiation, we created conditional knockout mice models for MEF2A and/or MEF2D. In vitro cultures of A- and D-KO osteoclasts were smaller and less numerous than wild type cultures, while AD-KO osteoclasts were almost completely devoid of TRAP positive mononuclear cells. Female A-KO mice are osteopetrotic while male A- and D-KO mice of either sex had no significant in vivo skeletal phenotype, suggesting a sex-specific regulation of osteoclasts by MEF2A. Lastly, in vivo male AD-KO mice are osteopenic, indicating while MEF2 is required for M-CSF and RANKL-stimulated osteoclastogenesis in vitro, osteoclasts can form in the absence of MEF2 in vivo via a RANKL-alternative pathway.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number115466
JournalBone
Volume138
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by are supported by NIH R01 AR061352 (K.M and E.J), T32AR050938 and Ray C. Anderson Fellowship (N.B.) and bridge funds by the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry (K.C.M.).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020

Keywords

  • Estrogen
  • HDACs
  • MEF2
  • Osteoclasts
  • Sex specific
  • Transcription factors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Loss of myocyte enhancer factor 2 expression in osteoclasts leads to opposing skeletal phenotypes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this