Making the science-library connection: A survey of sci-tech librarians

Linda Eells

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Previous studies have investigated the movement of scientists and library school students into science librarianship (Hackenberg and Chu 2002; Hallmark and Lembo 2003). This survey explores the hypothesis that an individuals' decision to choose science and technology (sci-tech) librarianship as a career is often triggered specifically by an exposure to science libraries or scientific research, and that this exposure often happens relatively late in a student's educational or career trajectory. Identifying specifically what specific experiences or factors were highly influential in attracting practicing librarians to the profession will enable recruiters to focus their efforts on appropriate points along career paths, and help to inform the design of recruiting media that presents an accurate and positive depiction of the profession. The discussion addresses the role of librarians as recruiters for the profession, and includes suggestions for reaching individuals who are not aware of sci-tech librarianship as a rewarding and challenging career option. The study collected in-depth data about the education, work, and personal histories of practicing sci-tech librarians, and included questions that yielded some interesting impressions about the importance of a science background to sci-tech librarianship, and characteristics of science librarian job requirements and candidate qualifications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationRecruiting, Training, and Retention of Science and Technology Librarians
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages135-158
Number of pages24
ISBN (Print)9780203052013
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Mentors
  • Recruitment
  • Surveys/science librarians

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making the science-library connection: A survey of sci-tech librarians'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this