Maximizing extraction of botulinum toxin type A from vials

Dennis D Dykstra, J. Michael Wieting, John McGuire, Thomas Kowalkowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the residual botulinum toxin remaining in vials after using 3 different extraction methods and to analyze the different techniques for measuring extraction efficacy. Design: Multicentered comparative study. Setting: Three academic movement disorder clinics. Participants: Thirty physicians were randomly surveyed for their botulinum toxin extraction methods. Three physicians evaluated the most common methods. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: Amount of toxin left in vials after each extraction method. Results: Toxin was least successfully extracted by using the vial inversion method. More toxin was extracted by using the 2-in needle method. The top removal method produced the least waste of toxin but is considered unsafe. Conclusions: The best and safest method for consistently extracting the most botulinum toxin from its vial was to use a long 21-gauge 2-in needle attached to a 3-mL syringe.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1638-1640
Number of pages3
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume83
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2002

Keywords

  • Botulinum toxin type A
  • Drug therapy
  • Rehabilitation
  • Spasticity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Maximizing extraction of botulinum toxin type A from vials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this