Mending Gaps in Knowledge: Collaborations in Neurogenic Bladder Research

Jeremy B. Myers; Darshan P. Patel; Sean P. Elliott; John T. Stoffel; Blayne Welk; Amitabh Jha; Sara M. Lenherr; Neurogenic Bladder Research Group

doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2017.04.015

Mending Gaps in Knowledge: Collaborations in Neurogenic Bladder Research

Jeremy B. Myers, Darshan P. Patel, Sean P. Elliott, John T. Stoffel, Blayne Welk, Amitabh Jha, Sara M. Lenherr, Neurogenic Bladder Research Group

Urology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life assessments are essential to studying conditions such as neurogenic bladder in which multiple management strategies are approximately equally efficacious. Innovations for the treatment of neurogenic bladder need to be guided by both clinical and patient-reported outcomes that are rigorously tested via high-quality prospective cohort or randomized studies. Collaborative research groups in reconstructive urology are critical to the study of uncommon disease processes because they allow studies to be powered adequately, foster innovative treatment strategies through collaboration, and help moderate the risk of investigator and or institutional biases.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	507-515
Number of pages	9
Journal	Urologic Clinics of North America
Volume	44
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2017.04.015
State	Published - Aug 2017

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Disclosures: Drs S. Elliott, S. Lenherr, J.B. Myers and J. Stoffel receive salary support and B. Welk and Amitabh Jha are paid consultants from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (CER14092138). Drs S. Elliott, S. Lenherr, J.B. Myers, and J. Stoffel receive salary support from the Department of Defense grant SCI170051. These grants are focused on spinal cord injury patients and use patient-reported outcomes.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.

Keywords

Complication
Incontinence
Neurogenic bladder
Patient-reported outcomes
Spinal cord injury

Access

10.1016/j.ucl.2017.04.015

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

@article{7e4b54cf834a450da6850b4ebd323132,

title = "Mending Gaps in Knowledge: Collaborations in Neurogenic Bladder Research",

abstract = "Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life assessments are essential to studying conditions such as neurogenic bladder in which multiple management strategies are approximately equally efficacious. Innovations for the treatment of neurogenic bladder need to be guided by both clinical and patient-reported outcomes that are rigorously tested via high-quality prospective cohort or randomized studies. Collaborative research groups in reconstructive urology are critical to the study of uncommon disease processes because they allow studies to be powered adequately, foster innovative treatment strategies through collaboration, and help moderate the risk of investigator and or institutional biases.",

keywords = "Complication, Incontinence, Neurogenic bladder, Patient-reported outcomes, Spinal cord injury",

author = "Myers, {Jeremy B.} and Patel, {Darshan P.} and Elliott, {Sean P.} and Stoffel, {John T.} and Blayne Welk and Amitabh Jha and Lenherr, {Sara M.} and {Neurogenic Bladder Research Group}",

note = "Funding Information: Disclosures: Drs S. Elliott, S. Lenherr, J.B. Myers and J. Stoffel receive salary support and B. Welk and Amitabh Jha are paid consultants from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (CER14092138). Drs S. Elliott, S. Lenherr, J.B. Myers, and J. Stoffel receive salary support from the Department of Defense grant SCI170051. These grants are focused on spinal cord injury patients and use patient-reported outcomes. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 Elsevier Inc.",

year = "2017",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1016/j.ucl.2017.04.015",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "44",

pages = "507--515",

journal = "Urologic Clinics of North America",

issn = "0094-0143",

publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mending Gaps in Knowledge

T2 - Collaborations in Neurogenic Bladder Research

AU - Myers, Jeremy B.

AU - Patel, Darshan P.

AU - Elliott, Sean P.

AU - Stoffel, John T.

AU - Welk, Blayne

AU - Jha, Amitabh

AU - Lenherr, Sara M.

AU - Neurogenic Bladder Research Group

N1 - Funding Information: Disclosures: Drs S. Elliott, S. Lenherr, J.B. Myers and J. Stoffel receive salary support and B. Welk and Amitabh Jha are paid consultants from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (CER14092138). Drs S. Elliott, S. Lenherr, J.B. Myers, and J. Stoffel receive salary support from the Department of Defense grant SCI170051. These grants are focused on spinal cord injury patients and use patient-reported outcomes. Publisher Copyright: © 2017 Elsevier Inc.

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life assessments are essential to studying conditions such as neurogenic bladder in which multiple management strategies are approximately equally efficacious. Innovations for the treatment of neurogenic bladder need to be guided by both clinical and patient-reported outcomes that are rigorously tested via high-quality prospective cohort or randomized studies. Collaborative research groups in reconstructive urology are critical to the study of uncommon disease processes because they allow studies to be powered adequately, foster innovative treatment strategies through collaboration, and help moderate the risk of investigator and or institutional biases.

AB - Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life assessments are essential to studying conditions such as neurogenic bladder in which multiple management strategies are approximately equally efficacious. Innovations for the treatment of neurogenic bladder need to be guided by both clinical and patient-reported outcomes that are rigorously tested via high-quality prospective cohort or randomized studies. Collaborative research groups in reconstructive urology are critical to the study of uncommon disease processes because they allow studies to be powered adequately, foster innovative treatment strategies through collaboration, and help moderate the risk of investigator and or institutional biases.

KW - Complication

KW - Incontinence

KW - Neurogenic bladder

KW - Patient-reported outcomes

KW - Spinal cord injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024111640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024111640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ucl.2017.04.015

DO - 10.1016/j.ucl.2017.04.015

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28716329

AN - SCOPUS:85024111640

SN - 0094-0143

VL - 44

SP - 507

EP - 515

JO - Urologic Clinics of North America

JF - Urologic Clinics of North America

IS - 3

ER -

Mending Gaps in Knowledge: Collaborations in Neurogenic Bladder Research

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access

OpenUrl availability

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this