TY - JOUR
T1 - Mind the gap
T2 - The potential of alternative health information exchange
AU - Everson, Jordan
AU - Cross, Dori A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Ascend Media. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of patient transitions that could be connected through 3 proprietary alternatives to open, community-based health information exchange (HIE): HIE between physicians who are part of the same integrated system, use the same electronic health record (EHR), or use an EHR that participates in an EHR vendor alliance. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of Medicare patient transitions and physician EHR adoption and organizational affiliation from SK&A. METHODS: We characterized the percentage of transitions that could be covered by each HIE approach and the degree of redundancy. We then assessed whether coverage opportunities differed by provider type and used multivariate linear regression to estimate the association between physician characteristics and proportion of transitions uncovered by any proprietary approach (ie, requiring an open HIE approach). RESULTS: Given current EHR adoption and organizational affiliations, 33% of transitions could be covered by proprietary HIE. For the average physician, open methods of HIE would still be needed for 45% of patients treated by other physicians. Physicians who did not use a market-leading EHR, were not members of a large integrated system, and shared patients with a broader network of physicians have the greatest need for open HIE. CONCLUSIONS: Proprietary approaches to HIE do not eliminate the need for open HIE and may further disadvantage providers in small healthcare organizations using less common EHRs. Ongoing support and innovative value creation within open HIE will likely remain necessary to support HIE by independent physicians. Public efforts to promote interoperability should seek to integrate proprietary models with open HIE.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of patient transitions that could be connected through 3 proprietary alternatives to open, community-based health information exchange (HIE): HIE between physicians who are part of the same integrated system, use the same electronic health record (EHR), or use an EHR that participates in an EHR vendor alliance. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of Medicare patient transitions and physician EHR adoption and organizational affiliation from SK&A. METHODS: We characterized the percentage of transitions that could be covered by each HIE approach and the degree of redundancy. We then assessed whether coverage opportunities differed by provider type and used multivariate linear regression to estimate the association between physician characteristics and proportion of transitions uncovered by any proprietary approach (ie, requiring an open HIE approach). RESULTS: Given current EHR adoption and organizational affiliations, 33% of transitions could be covered by proprietary HIE. For the average physician, open methods of HIE would still be needed for 45% of patients treated by other physicians. Physicians who did not use a market-leading EHR, were not members of a large integrated system, and shared patients with a broader network of physicians have the greatest need for open HIE. CONCLUSIONS: Proprietary approaches to HIE do not eliminate the need for open HIE and may further disadvantage providers in small healthcare organizations using less common EHRs. Ongoing support and innovative value creation within open HIE will likely remain necessary to support HIE by independent physicians. Public efforts to promote interoperability should seek to integrate proprietary models with open HIE.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060238076&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060238076&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 30667609
AN - SCOPUS:85060238076
SN - 1088-0224
VL - 25
SP - 32
EP - 38
JO - American Journal of Managed Care
JF - American Journal of Managed Care
IS - 1
ER -